Senior lenders accept earnouts, but only on their terms: the earnout is subordinated to the loan, and each payment is allowed only if there is no default and the company passes its covenant tests after making it. If a payment is blocked, it is usually deferred, not cancelled. Lenders also model the payment year, when coverage is tightest, and read how the credit agreement counts the earnout in leverage and fixed charges. A well-drafted earnout protects the seller's upside without putting the loan at risk; a badly drafted one trips the covenant the better the company performs.
- What an earnout is to a lender
- Deferred, contingent purchase price that competes with debt service for cash
- Usual senior lender terms
- Subordination, payment conditions, pro forma covenant tests before each payment
- If a payment is blocked
- Usually deferred and paid later, not forgiven
- Where it can bite
- The payment year, when the earnout is largest and coverage is tightest
- Ways to fund it
- Operating cash within a cap, a delayed-draw term loan, or new equity
Why buyers and sellers use earnouts, and why lenders care
An earnout closes a gap between what a seller thinks the company is worth and what a buyer will pay today. The seller believes last year's growth will continue; the buyer is not willing to pay for it until it does. The earnout splits the difference: part of the price is paid at closing, and more is paid later if the company hits agreed targets for revenue, gross profit or EBITDA.
For the buyer's lender, the earnout is not a side agreement between buyer and seller. It is a future cash payment out of the same company that is servicing the loan, due at exactly the moment the lender is counting on that cash. It also tends to fall due when the company is doing well, which is when a lender expects to see the loan paid down. And it can become a source of dispute between the buyer and a seller who is often still working in the business. Lenders therefore underwrite the earnout as part of the capital structure, not as a detail of the purchase agreement.
Lenders do not object to earnouts. They object to earnouts that can be paid while the loan is in trouble.
How senior lenders treat an earnout
From banks, private credit funds and unitranche lenders alike, the treatment of an earnout is settled in the credit agreement and usually in a subordination agreement signed by the seller. The terms lenders commonly ask for are these:
| Term | What it does | Why the lender wants it |
|---|---|---|
| Subordination | The seller's right to earnout payments ranks behind the senior loan | The loan is repaid first if the company fails |
| No default | No payment while an event of default is continuing | Cash is not paid out of a company that is already in breach |
| Pro forma covenant test | The company must pass its leverage and coverage covenants after the payment, not just before it | A payment cannot be the thing that pushes the company into breach |
| Liquidity or availability test | Minimum cash or revolver availability after the payment | The company keeps enough cash to run through a slow period |
| Deferral, not forfeiture | A blocked payment accrues and is paid once the tests are met | The seller accepts the blocker because the money is delayed, not lost |
| Limits on acceleration and remedies | The seller cannot sue for or accelerate a blocked payment while the senior loan is outstanding | A dispute with the seller cannot force the company into default |
The subordination agreement is where most negotiation happens, because it is the one document the seller signs with the lender. Sellers push for payments to be allowed whenever the company is not in default; lenders push for a pro forma test on every payment. Sellers push for interest on deferred amounts; lenders push to keep deferral open-ended. A seller's counsel who has not seen one before will often assume the lender's form is a negotiating position rather than a condition. It is usually closer to a condition.
Earnouts in the loan sizing
Lenders size the loan on the company's earnings and debt service without the earnout. But they also model what happens when the earnout is paid, because the payment year is when coverage is tightest. A simple case, in plain numbers: a company earns 2,000 a year and its debt payments are 1,400, so it covers them comfortably. In the year the earnout pays 400, the cash left for debt service is 1,600 against payments of 1,400, which is below the 1.25x coverage conventional bank lenders commonly look for. If the credit agreement tests coverage after the earnout payment, the payment is blocked until the company grows or the debt comes down.
That example shows the paradox of a badly drafted earnout: the better the company performs, the larger the earnout, and the more likely it is to trip the covenant that protects the lender. Buyers can avoid it in three ways. Cap the earnout at an amount the company can pay out of cash flow in the payment year. Spread payments over more than one year. Or fund the earnout from a source other than operating cash, such as a delayed-draw term loan or new equity. Each of these has to be visible in the financing model the lender reviews.
How lenders test coverage is covered in debt service coverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio; many credit agreements define fixed charges to include earnout payments, so the payment itself counts against the test.
Earnouts in leverage and covenant definitions
Two accounting points matter for covenants. First, under GAAP the earnout liability recorded at closing is re-measured at each reporting date, and changes in its value flow through the income statement; credit agreements commonly exclude those changes from covenant EBITDA so that a better-than-expected year does not reduce covenant earnings. Second, credit agreements differ on whether an earned but unpaid earnout counts as debt for the leverage test. Some count it once the amount is fixed; others only once it is overdue.
Both are definitions the buyer should read before signing, not after the first test date. They sit alongside the rest of the covenant EBITDA definition, and a few words in either can decide whether a strong year produces a covenant breach. Where the senior lender will not stretch its definitions, a junior layer such as mezzanine debt or a delayed-draw commitment can be sized to fund the earnout when it falls due.
Earnout, seller note or rollover equity
The earnout is one of three ways to defer part of the price. Each sits differently in the capital structure.
| Earnout | Seller note | Rollover equity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | Contingent on performance | Fixed | A stake in the buyer's company |
| Seller's risk | Targets are missed, or payment is blocked | Payments are blocked or deferred | The company's value falls |
| Senior lender view | Subordinated; payments conditioned on covenant tests | Subordinated; payments often conditioned the same way | Equity: ranks behind all debt, no payments due |
| In leverage tests | Depends on the credit agreement's definitions | Counted in total leverage | Not counted |
| Best use | Genuine disagreement about future growth | A price gap with no dispute about value | Keeping the seller aligned with the new owners |
Rollover equity is common in sponsor-backed deals, where the seller keeps a stake in the new company; see rollover equity in acquisition financing. For many buyers, the right answer is a lower fixed price with a seller note, which a lender can underwrite, rather than a higher headline price with an earnout, which it has to block. The comparison is on earnout vs seller note.
Structuring an earnout that does not break the financing
Buyers who need an earnout can make it much easier for a lender to accept:
- Measure it on a figure the lender also tests. An earnout on EBITDA calculated the same way as the credit agreement's EBITDA avoids two sets of books and two arguments. Revenue-based earnouts are simpler to measure but can pay out when margins are falling.
- Cap it. A maximum payment in each year that the model shows the company can afford after debt service.
- Agree the blocker before signing the purchase agreement. A seller who learns about the subordination terms after the price is agreed will reopen the price.
- Say where the cash comes from. Operating cash, a delayed-draw facility or new equity, shown in the financing model year by year.
- Keep the seller's role clear. If the seller runs the business during the earnout period, lenders want to know who controls the decisions that drive the target.
Midas Partners models the earnout year by year in the financing model it builds for lenders, alongside the debt service and covenant tests, so a lender sees the payment year before it is asked. The model is part of the full lender package, built in a day once the documents are in, and a senior banker checks every page before the client approves it; see the package.
Common questions
- Will a lender finance an acquisition that includes an earnout?
- Banks and private credit funds commonly do, as long as the earnout is subordinated to the loan and each payment is allowed only when there is no default and the company passes its covenant tests after the payment.
- What happens to the seller if an earnout payment is blocked?
- In most senior lender structures the payment is deferred, not forfeited. It accrues and is paid once the company meets the tests again. The seller usually cannot sue for it or accelerate it while the senior loan is outstanding.
- Does an earnout count as debt?
- It depends on the credit agreement. Some count an earned but unpaid earnout as debt for the leverage test; others do not until it is overdue. It is a definition worth reading before signing.
- How can the company pay an earnout without tripping its covenants?
- Cap each year's payment at what the model shows the company can afford, spread payments over more than one year, or fund them from a delayed-draw term loan or new equity rather than operating cash.
- Is a seller note better than an earnout?
- For lenders it is easier to underwrite, because the amount is fixed. An earnout makes sense when buyer and seller genuinely disagree about future growth; where they do not, a lower fixed price with a seller note is usually simpler to finance.